-OR-
The
Profit in Prevarication...
I
grew up in the antique business, and in my antique business days, all
of the antique dealers loved to purchase items from local hucksters
who routinely brought pick-up truck loads of “antiques” to the
downtown area and if possible, play one dealer against another. It was often a
scene of cat and mouse, as dealers watched them work the business
district, considering when might be the most opportune time to
strike. The “pickers” had their own strategy, always going to the
big spenders first, and forcing the others to “pony up,” or be
left out.
Sometimes
the dealers would get too excited and enthusiastic, loving the sense
of opportunity, and ignoring the fact that what they were ravaging
through was a truckload of junk. Or worse, a carefully crafted trap.
This
game always included a certain inevitable element of bluffing, acting
and other poker skills, and sometimes there was outright lying and
even counterfeiting. On both sides. The dealers had to act like they
did not care, that the items were common, of little value. They were
only dispassionately gazing into the bed of the old truck out of
altruistic philanthropy. And in the process, setting themselves up
for the kill. This contest led to a much more sophisticated scrimmage
of prevarication for profit.
The
pickers had their own tricks, and had come to use me as a test, and
if their newest counterfeit antique passed my inspection (it rarely
did), then they felt as if they had truly accomplished something. I
often laughed them off, but sometimes I had to complement them on
their artistry. The thing that amazed me the most, was that my fellow
dealers were usually never very interested in my warnings to them,
that counterfeits were being regularly circulated.
I
sometimes visited their homes, whenever they had a new batch of junk,
ready to seize anything of value that could be sold for some profit.
One day they were all gathered around a drum fire in their primitive outdoor furniture building area, telling lies, bragging and scheming, and I
saw one of them quietly carving on an old polished cow horn. He
handed it to me shamelessly, to get my reaction. It was crudely
inscribed, with a name and date, which elevated it to the appearance
of folk art and a highly collectible thing... I always tried to
ignore their counterfeiting efforts, trying to encourage the more
boring vocation of really “picking” old things from barns and
abandoned farm houses. On this day I just smirked and kept walking.
But I could not help but shake my head.
A
couple of weeks later I saw the same horn hanging from a fellow
dealer's private stash behind his desk. It was “not for sale”...
or at least that was the game... making the price much higher for
anyone who had to have it. I blurted out before I could think, and
let him know that I recognized the cow horn. I went ahead and told
him what he had, and worried out loud about what he had to pay for
it. He would not say immediately, unable to discern whether I was
telling him the truth, or kidding him, or even trying to acquire it
myself, but defiantly admitted that he had given a reasonable sum.
I
assured him that I had no interest in it, and told him that he should
never sell it, because that kind of thing could hurt his own
reputation. He shrugged, unable to let go of the “find of the
week,” and unwilling to affirm my assessment. He was going to keep
it, he said, as it looked good hanging there. And that was that.
So
far no laws had been broken; One fellow had made a half-ass
“replica.” No harm in that. Another fellow had showed it to the
antique dealer. No crime there. He left it with him to ponder. No
pressure was applied. Later a third fellow came by and picked up a
check. Just a courier of the transaction... so nothing illegal or
unethical had been done or said by any of the parties. Each had an
“innocent” role in a process carefully woven with plausible
deniability.
But
a damnable lie had been established and was hanging in that shop, for
all to see, and misunderstand. All while the buying public assumed
that a reputable dealer would never proudly display a worthless
counterfeit artifact. Soon the lie easily became the most coveted
item in town. Until the next lie floated in. This was a veritable
counterfeit antique ring, covered by smiles and innocence, and after
all, nobody was hurt by it. Well, not physically. And great
conversation was enjoyed by all, by those passing through, and those
participating in the process.
And
this is EXACTLY how the American Media functions today. One source
creates a lie. No harm in itself... in fact it could be considered a
joke or parody. Another source merely repeats it... not claiming its
authorship, but advancing the lie to Media outlets. No crime in
repeating a lie. The Media publishes these lies, a truckload of
clever counterfeits, or just pure junk, ostensibly obtained from
“reliable sources.” Nobody claims the information is reliable,
only that it was passed on by persons of influence or reputation. The
lie is then borrowed, repeated, reworded, pondered, cultivated, and
generally spread until it is considered a solid fact. And no one has
broken the law. Not even tarnished their ethics.
No one can be directly accused of "bearing false witness," one of the more neglected of the Ten Commandments. But I get some satisfaction believing that God knows all about it.
No one can be directly accused of "bearing false witness," one of the more neglected of the Ten Commandments. But I get some satisfaction believing that God knows all about it.
Newspapers,
news broadcasts, magazines, and Internet news outlets all profit from
the lie, which in some cases can be exploited for months or years.
Until someone proves it to be untrue. And in some cases, that cannot
be done. Lies are easily the most profitable and dependable material
being trafficked by the national Media. And it has always been the
case. Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Herbert Hoover, and even
Franklin Roosevelt could all tell you of egregious lies printed and
reprinted about them. The Press has always had scurrilous characters
who understood this “gray area” long before somebody coined the
phrase “plausible deniability,” and ambitious “journalists”
have always been willing to capitalize on it.
Bizarrely,
our brave soldiers fight and sacrifice life and limb to defend the
right of the Media to perpetuate this wicked chain of injustice.
Hunkered in the corner under the auspices of “Freedom of the
Press,” lurk the insidious profiteers of prevarication.
There
may be no laws to prevent such activity, no prosecution of those who
dance in the gray of plausible deniability, cleverly designing their
alibis while dealing in laundered lies. But observers have warned for
centuries about the latent threat of malicious propaganda designed to
confuse and redirect societies.
Alexis
de Tocqueville predicted the oncoming strategies overwhelming us
today. Edward Bernays and others made a science of population
management via mass psychology. Now a hundred years later, Russian
disinformation has partnered with partisan manipulation of law
enforcement, and the force-feeding of the Media poisonous narratives
guaranteed to implement Lenin's secret weapon: “Confirmation bias.”
The founder of Soviet Russia built his empire on deception, and that
was done by cleverly telling what Lenin knew the Russian people
wanted to hear. Could he have known, what we have learned through
scientific research, that people actually get a dopamine rush from
belief affirmation? Thanks to all of the major networks, Americans
are actually mentally and physically addicted to the gratuitous,
incendiary trashing of the president; An evil yet effective strategy
straight out of Vladimir Lenin's playbook.
It
has become a race to oblivion, a question of which will burn out
first. Whether the American experiment can outlast the dying
newspaper business, pervasively discredited and now cannibalizing
itself to survive. We can only hope there will be a special place in
Hell for those who knowingly proliferated lies for profit, or worse,
for some despicable political strategy.
No comments:
Post a Comment